ENDEAVOUR FORUM NEWS WEEKLY ARTICLES
|
|
WOMEN'S HEALTH RISK IGNORED BY RUDD GOVTBABETTE FRANCIS, DECEMBER 12, 2009
During October, the gender and reproductive health unit of the federal Department of Health held consultations in major cities on a "new National Women's Health Policy". The Melbourne consultation was at the Windsor Hotel. It was all very gracious - we were seated at tables in groups of 10, and a healthy lunch was provided with fruit for dessert, and no cakes or pastries. However, a revealing incident towards the end of the consultation rather spoilt the ambience of the occasion. One of the attendees - the only man present - made a verbal submission on how natural family planning achieved a higher success rate at lower cost for sub-fertile women who wished to have babies, compared to the lower success rate at much higher cost achieved by IVF procedures. A radical feminist at an adjoining table leapt to her feet and interrupted him declaiming that she was sick of the Right to Life with its religious agenda. The chairwoman did not rule her out of order and did not allow the man to finish his presentation. She claimed it was because time had run out, but we felt he should have been allowed to finish as he had been unfairly interrupted. The interjector was illogical as the man was not a member of Right to Life, was not speaking on its behalf, nor was there anything religious about his presentation. He was statistically comparing success rates and costs of two methods of achieving pregnancy and a live baby. The interjector not only demonstrated the lack of logic for which radical feminists are famous when dealing with scientific data that does not support their agenda (e.g., insisting at one and the same time that men and women are the same but women have more empathy, better communication skills, etc.); but she was also exhibiting the rage which grips radical feminists when any wholesome suggestion is made in regard to reproductive health. As the focus of the Rudd Government's "new" health policy is on "prevention", representatives of my Endeavour Forum and I did our best to have recorded the physical and psychological risks faced by women who have abortions. As the deadline for submissions was November 20, we believe it is important for concerned citizens to follow up these submissions by writing directly to Health Minister Nicola Roxon, at Parliament House, Canberra, asking her why women are not given information on which to make an informed choice. Listed in the blue box on this page are medical references we provided in our submission, including:
This new study by researchers at the University of Otago indicates that
85 per cent of women who had abortions reported negative mental health
outcomes as a result. The authors concluded that anywhere from 1.5 to
5.5 per cent of all mental health disorders in New Zealand result from
women having had abortions. Fergusson and his team assert that there is
little justification for claiming that legal abortions should be promoted
on the basis of improving a woman's mental health.
|
|
Member Organisation, World Council for Life and Family NGO in Special Consultative Status with ECOSOC of the UN
|