ENDEAVOUR FORUM NEWSLETTER No. 138, May 2010

 

 

Home | Contact Us | Newsletters

BOOK SHELF

“IDEOLOGICAL JIHAD - Come Mr. Aly Let Us Reason Together” by Vickie Janson. $18 if ordered from ideologicaljihad@gmail.com Also available from Koorong Stores. Reviewed by John Morrissey, writer and teacher.

If you are looking for a bland and reassuring appeal for reconciliation between moderate Muslims and Western civilisation, with its Judeo-Christian roots, then Vickie Janson’s publication is not for you. With the authority gained from years of study of Islam’s teaching and dialogue with Australian Muslims, she shows that the sticking points are both inherent and alarming in their implications. Her findings are also endorsed by a foreword from Dr Mark Durie, one of Australia’s leading writers on the relationship between church and state.

The book takes the form of a respectful but frank address to the Islamic Council of Victoria’s Waleed Aly and the claims which he made in his work People Like Us: How Arrogance is dividing Islam and the West (2007). Throughout the text, the author appeals continually to ‘Mr Aly’. Her conclusions will not be palatable for those who sincerely believe in the possibility of accommodation with Islam, but the promise of her sub-title, Come Mr Aly, Let Us Reason Together, is borne out by her arguments substantiated by references to the Qu’ran and the public statements of Muslim scholars.

Ideological Jihad examines the claim that we share a common spiritual heritage, shows the differences between Islam and the Western concept of the state, makes some interesting comments on the topical issue of the veil, and exposes the reality behind the often blurred term “jihad”. Readers will find some of her conclusions a little too uncompromising, but hard to refute, given the evidence offered. Vickie Janson argues that we do not share a common spiritual heritage as “people of the book” and monotheists, because our understanding of God and our relationship with the Divine are so fundamentally different. The total submission required by Islam to the point of being a slave is so different from the Judeo-Christian concepts of Covenant and love that we have to recognise that they are poles apart. She
develops rather beautifully and at length the theme of love of God and our neighbour throughout the Old and New Testaments, which came to perfection in the person of the Messiah, Our Lord Jesus Christ. His message was somewhat different from that of The Prophet six centuries later!

But it should be recognised that this does not mean that we worship and pray to different Gods. If Muslims recognise the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, it is their understanding of the nature of this God and our relationship with Him which differs from that of Jews and Christians, not the apprehended reality. To say that we worship and pray to a different God would be dangerously close to admitting the charge from atheists like Richard Dawkins that God exists only as a concept in the minds of mankind, that is that creation begets the Creator.

Christians often squirm when the austerity of Islam is contrasted with the permissiveness of Western society, but the author has an answer to this unity of church and state which is the Muslim model sanctioned in the Qu’ran. She shows readers the difference between the concept of what is permitted (halal) and that which is unclean or sinful in Islam, and the Christian distinction between what is sacred or holy and what is not sacred but not necessarily sinful.

The author defends secular society, with its separation of church and state, and emphasises the democratic freedom which it embodies for us all – including Muslims – even while it does permit the moral shortcomings for which it is blamed. We are reminded that the alternative is the imposition of Sharia law, which has been reintroduced in countries such as Pakistan and Iran and even found limited acceptance in Western countries (in the name of tolerance and respect for cultural differences), to the detriment of those subject to it – especially women.

On the question of wearing the veil in Western countries, Vickie Janson’s arguments are less complex. She advances some quite basic concerns, which would appear to apply particularly to the full niqab, as worn in Saudi Arabia, and the burqa, as found in Afghanistan, rather than the mere hair-concealing hijab or chador. Fundamentally, she is irked by the presumption of purity and superiority expressed by many who wear the veil, and suggests that the under-exposure witnessed when confronted by the full veil offends our sense of decency or openness. To this she adds the usual concerns about the veil symbolising the subjugation of women and perhaps involving security risks.

For this reviewer at least, the chapter on jihad is the most important, and Vickie Janson saves it until last. She refutes the familiar argument that the holy war is a Christian concept, exemplified by the Crusades, and reminds us that the extent of Islam by 1095 AD had been won by the sword under an imperative inherent in its teachings. Thus the Crusades were a response to what for Muslims was an ongoing holy war to extend Islam. The author also notes that the hideous slaughter carried out by Christians in the sacking of cities was contrary to the teachings of Jesus, while similar atrocities on the part of Muhammad’s followers were quite in accord with his teachings.

So successful is the author in establishing that the command to violent jihad is inherent in Islam that the reassurances of her opponents are shown to be quite hollow. She quotes local Muslims who understand it to mean “holy fighting” and refuse to condemn suicide bombing. Furthermore, she concludes that the oft-expressed fears about Islamophobia are also disingenuous, the real source of fear being that of retribution from other Muslims.

In essence, Vickie Janson has disposed of Mr Aly’s charge that the fault lies principally with non-Muslims. However unpalatable it is, she shows that Islam seeks accommodation only on its own terms, those being submission when it is dominant and sharia law for its adherents when it is in the minority. To read Ideological Jihad is a sobering experience.

 

Member Organisation, World Council for Life and Family

NGO in Special Consultative Status with ECOSOC of the UN